Eagle_Protector_V22_AntiDebugLIB_20081008

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule Eagle_Protector_V22_AntiDebugLIB_20081008 (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule Eagle_Protector_V22_AntiDebugLIB_20081008: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? BB 55 ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? 83 FB 55 E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? 75 2E E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? C3 60 E8 ?? ?? ?? 00 5D 81 ED ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B D5 81 C2 ?? ?? ?? ?? 52 E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? C3 C3 E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? C3 E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? 33 C0 64 FF 30 64 89 20 CC C3 }
    condition:
        $a at pe.entry_point

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

ff9d09eb-40b3-42ea-bee0-a78021f0d708

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion