WWPACK_v300_v301_Extractable

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule WWPACK_v300_v301_Extractable (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule WWPACK_v300_v301_Extractable: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { B8 ?? ?? 8C CA 03 D0 8C C9 81 C1 ?? ?? 51 6A ?? 06 06 8C D3 83 ?? ?? 53 6A ?? FC }
        $b = { 55 8B EC 81 EC ?? ?? 00 00 53 56 57 6A 01 5E 6A 04 89 75 E8 FF 15 ?? 40 40 00 FF 15 ?? 40 40 00 8B F8 89 7D ?? 8A 07 3C 22 0F 85 ?? 00 00 00 8A 47 01 47 89 7D ?? 33 DB 3A C3 74 0D 3C 22 74 09 8A 47 01 47 89 7D ?? EB EF 80 3F 22 75 04 47 89 7D ?? 80 3F 20 75 09 47 80 3F 20 74 FA 89 7D ?? 53 FF 15 ?? 40 40 00 80 3F 2F 89 45 ?? 75 ?? 8A 47 01 3C 53 74 04 3C 73 75 06 89 35 }
    condition:
        for any of ($*) : ( $ at pe.entry_point )

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

b3c871f2-4019-4bb8-be41-df7bba4322ca

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion