eXPressor_v1451_CGSoftLabs

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule eXPressor_v1451_CGSoftLabs (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule eXPressor_v1451_CGSoftLabs: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { 55 8B EC 83 EC 58 53 56 57 83 65 DC 00 F3 EB 0C 65 58 50 72 2D 76 2E 31 2E 34 2E 00 A1 00 ?? ?? ?? 05 00 ?? ?? ?? A3 08 ?? ?? ?? A1 08 ?? ?? ?? B9 81 ?? ?? ?? 2B 48 18 89 0D 0C ?? ?? ?? 83 3D 10 ?? ?? ?? 00 74 16 A1 08 ?? ?? ?? 8B 0D 0C ?? ?? ?? 03 48 14 }
        $b = { 55 8B EC 83 EC 58 53 56 57 83 65 DC 00 F3 EB 0C 65 58 50 72 2D 76 2E 31 2E 34 2E 00 A1 00 ?? ?? ?? 05 00 ?? ?? ?? A3 08 ?? ?? ?? A1 08 ?? ?? ?? B9 81 ?? ?? ?? 2B 48 18 89 0D 0C ?? ?? ?? 83 3D 10 ?? ?? ?? 00 74 16 A1 08 ?? ?? ?? 8B 0D 0C ?? ?? ?? 03 48 14 89 4D CC }
    condition:
        for any of ($*) : ( $ at pe.entry_point )

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

bdd7d129-7100-4a14-9718-2a922a8e574d

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion