UPX_v20_Markus_Laszlo_Reiser

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule UPX_v20_Markus_Laszlo_Reiser (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule UPX_v20_Markus_Laszlo_Reiser: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { 55 FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 09 C0 74 07 89 03 83 C3 04 EB ?? FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B AE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE 00 F0 FF FF BB 00 10 00 00 50 54 6A 04 53 57 FF D5 8D 87 ?? ?? 00 00 80 20 7F 80 60 28 7F 58 50 54 50 53 57 FF D5 58 61 8D 44 24 80 6A 00 39 C4 75 FA 83 EC 80 }
        $b = { 55 FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 09 C0 74 07 89 03 83 C3 04 EB ?? FF 96 ?? ?? ?? ?? 8B AE ?? ?? ?? ?? 8D BE 00 F0 FF FF BB 00 10 00 00 50 54 6A 04 53 57 FF D5 8D 87 ?? ?? 00 00 80 20 7F 80 60 28 7F 58 50 54 50 53 57 FF D5 58 61 8D 44 24 80 6A 00 39 C4 75 FA 83 EC 80 E9 }
    condition:
        for any of ($*) : ( $ at pe.entry_point )

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

e1688ebd-30d2-4560-a83f-7b6a871976eb

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion