Obsidium_v1304_Obsidium_Software_additional

YARA detection rule by Yara-Rules · GPL-2.0

Rule Obsidium_v1304_Obsidium_Software_additional (No description metadata provided).

import "pe"
rule Obsidium_v1304_Obsidium_Software_additional: PEiD
{
    strings:
        $a = { EB 02 ?? ?? E8 25 00 00 00 EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? EB 01 ?? 8B 54 24 0C EB 01 ?? 83 82 B8 00 00 00 23 EB 01 ?? 33 C0 EB 02 ?? ?? C3 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 64 67 FF 36 00 00 EB 03 ?? ?? ?? 64 67 89 26 00 00 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 01 ?? 50 EB 01 ?? 33 C0 EB 01 ?? 8B 00 EB 01 ?? C3 EB 02 ?? ?? E9 FA 00 00 00 EB 02 ?? ?? E8 D5 FF FF FF EB 03 ?? ?? ?? EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 58 EB 02 ?? ?? EB 04 ?? ?? ?? ?? 64 67 8F 06 00 00 EB 03 ?? ?? ?? 83 C4 04 EB 01 ?? E8 3B 26 00 00 }
    condition:
        $a at pe.entry_point

}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

71a12e11-510c-45e2-b45f-922e42dc613f

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion