AntiDote10Demo12SISTeam

YARA detection rule by malware-lu · GPL-2.0

Rule AntiDote10Demo12SISTeam (No description metadata provided).

rule AntiDote10Demo12SISTeam
{
      meta:
		author="malware-lu"
strings:
		$a0 = { 00 00 00 00 09 01 47 65 74 43 6F 6D 6D 61 6E 64 4C 69 6E 65 41 00 DB 01 47 65 74 56 65 72 73 69 6F 6E 45 78 41 00 73 01 47 65 74 4D 6F 64 75 6C 65 46 69 6C 65 4E 61 6D 65 41 00 00 7A 03 57 61 69 74 46 6F 72 53 69 6E 67 6C 65 4F 62 6A 65 63 74 00 BF 02 52 65 73 75 6D 65 54 68 72 65 61 64 00 00 29 03 53 65 74 54 68 72 65 61 64 43 6F 6E 74 65 78 74 00 00 94 03 57 72 69 74 65 50 72 6F 63 65 73 73 4D 65 6D 6F 72 79 00 00 6B 03 56 69 72 74 75 61 6C 41 6C 6C 6F 63 45 78 00 00 A6 02 52 65 61 64 50 72 6F 63 65 73 73 4D 65 6D 6F 72 79 00 CA 01 47 65 74 54 68 72 65 61 64 43 6F 6E 74 65 78 74 00 00 62 00 43 72 65 61 74 65 50 72 6F 63 65 73 73 41 00 00 4B 45 52 4E 45 4C 33 32 2E 64 6C 6C }

condition:
		$a0
}

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

b9733e8c-d8da-40b6-a9ab-2bcd16a42187

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion