ET EXPLOIT_KIT DRIVEBY Router DNS Changer Apr 07 2015 M2

SURICATA detection rule by Unknown · GPL-2.0

No description provided

alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"ET EXPLOIT_KIT DRIVEBY Router DNS Changer Apr 07 2015 M2"; flow:established,to_client; file.data; content:"|22 5c 78 35 32 5c 78 35 34 5c 78 34 33 5c 78 35 30 5c 78 36 35 5c 78 36 35 5c 78 37 32 5c 78 34 33 5c 78 36 46 5c 78 36 45 5c 78 36 45 5c 78 36 35 5c 78 36 33 5c 78 37 34 5c 78 36 39 5c 78 36 46 5c 78 36 45 22|"; content:!"vidzi.tv|0d 0a|"; reference:url,malware.dontneedcoffee.com/2015/05/an-exploit-kit-dedicated-to-csrf.html; classtype:exploit-kit; sid:2020896; rev:4; metadata:affected_product Any, attack_target Client_Endpoint, created_at 2015_04_13, deployment Perimeter, confidence High, signature_severity Major, tag DriveBy, updated_at 2024_03_14;)

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

05e0826c-7840-46bf-af63-334dcdf2eb19

Propose edits, view related rules, and engage with the community through comments.

Executable code, not a declarative rule

This submission is arbitrary [[ currentRule.format ? currentRule.format.toUpperCase() : '' ]] code, not a declarative detection rule — review it as you would any script before running it, and note that it cannot be safely aggregated or auto-executed alongside YARA/Sigma/Suricata/CRS rules.

Rejected pattern present

[[ reason ]]

What does this mean?

Format & documentation suggestions

Not a security issue — this rule is valid and was accepted as-is. These are optional fields/conventions its own format recommends, mainly affecting its quality score and how well it documents itself for other reviewers.

[[ reason ]]

What do these messages mean?

[[ currentRule.title && currentRule.title.length > 60 ? currentRule.title.slice(0, 60) + '…' : currentRule.title ]]

[[ currentRule.title ]]

Community Discussion